Systemic players can make or break the paris goal
<aside>
ℹ️
Key topics
- Corporations have more direct power and control over their emissions than states.
- Control over Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Absolute targets vs. intensity targets
- Causality: a legally relevant contribution to climate change
</aside>
4.1 Introduction & Strategy
- Selection of Defendants – Systemic Players that Fail to Align their Climate Policies with the Temperature Goal of the Paris Agreement
- Causality – The Link between the Emissions of the Defendant and Dangerous Climate Change
4.2 Legal Documents
4.2.1 Appeal
- Oral hearings April 2024
- Shell’s Responsibility for Scope 3 Emissions
- Shell Has Full Control Over Its Scope 3 Emissions
- Absolute vs. Intensity Targets
4.2.2 First Instance
- Corporations Have a More Direct Power Over Their Emissions Than States
- Scope 3
- Absolute vs. Intensity Targets | Causality
4.3 The Judgment
- Power and Control Over Emissions
- Emission Exceeds Emissions of Many States
- Proportional Responsibility to Respect Human Rights
- Control and Influence